17 March 2006

UK All The Way.

Expect a long post upon my arrival back stateside.

15 March 2006

"When I first invited George Clooney to blog after a screening of Good Night, and Good Luck in New York a few months ago, he said he wasn't sure how a blog worked."

I read this today on Arianna Huffington's media/blog/whatever site. Don't get me wrong, I classify myself as liberal and enjoy what she writes and what she stands for but this really honed in on my annoyance with our preoccupation with celebrities who do other things besides be celebrities. It aggravates me that celebrities act so exhausted by their fame and seem to want to illustrate redundantly that they, too, are a part of the American public (regardless of whether they originate from the US or not, come on, your life is in Hollywood, how much more American can you get?) and they have feelings about politics, war, hunger, welfare, human rights, you name it and they have an opinion.

Case in point: Angelina Jolie. The fact that she like travels the world to use her fame to work with the UN not only insinuates that the UN itself is preoccupied with celebrity fame and all that it can bring to starving children, AIDS patients, and other third world country issues...be/c who really cares if you're under 8 and live in Darfur with no hope of any real help from the UN or Angelina Jolie for that matter (unless she adopts you. And again, don't get me wrong, I myself am a child of adoption so I am all for it), which is an embarassment to an organization like the UN. So why all the hoo haw about the latest celebrity getting appointed to some ambassador position with the UN? Its inappropriate that the UN and other political organizations (although I can't think of any, I am sure that the Democratic Party appreciates the money and efforts of people like Clooney and, say, Susan Sarandon) prop these celebrities up with a sort of above normal intellectual standing compared to average Americans - or even those Americans devoted towards educating themselves (by educating I mean college degrees and higher) who work towards bettering the bottom level problems, like working in, say, Phoenix for a veterans hospital, sans the UN glamour or a hot button controversy (Celebrities, your ticket to intellectual acceptance is to pick on the Bush administration loudly. Totally proves you're wayyy smarter than your peers), which in the end always gives more press to the celebrity voicing their opinions than issue itself.

So yes, I am saying that it is unfair that those celebrities get such an elevated soap box and real people who don't have the financial luxury to do such glamo philanthropist work miss out on opportunities to work side by side with leaders in the UN, or get articles on CNN.com, to sound off about our current administration. It simply hammers home that the average voter does not matter.

Have money, will vote. Have celebrity status, will get at good amount of column inches in not just US Weekly but maybe even the Washington Post, too.

Its almost like we are rewarding or congratulating these celebrities for doing something with their time and money outside of just looking good, acting (which I do believe is a talent, but being a celebrity, eh, not so much), and otherwise just spending cash...and it bothers me so many of them are uneducated. I mean to get a real position with the UN, you typically have to be fluent in two languages, like French and English, and also need a very advanced degree, a J.D., a Ph.D, what have you.

I am not saying that celebrities shouldn't think or concern themselves with anything other than trivial material matters, and I am not saying that they're stupid, its just that I don't think organizations, be it media or political, should care what they do or think any more than they care about what the average American really does.

Sure, I might agree with the majority of what these liberal celebs say but to be perfectly clear its nothing that any other half liberal has thought themselves. I don't think it ways in any more heavily than if my old political science professor thinks. In fact, he probably knows more than they do but who really cares what he thinks? He has never been named People's Sexiest Man Alive.

14 March 2006

The "Pretty Fly" Entry
Date: 14 March 2006
Climate: Blustery Day
Eating: Salad from Fields
Drinking: water
Feeling: emo
Listening to: Lindsay Lohan, Minus the Bear, Shiny Toy Guns, Her Space Holiday
Watching: last night I watched the Apprentice.
Reading: Trib

There are times when I feel as though I have nothing left to say or write for that matter. My thoughts are dreamy and nonsequential and usually deal with musings that no one would really care about. Today it was a different story, and it really took efefct when I read the following: "Ryan Jury asks for Law dictionary...The federal jury deciding the fate of former Gov. George Ryan asked its first written question during its second day of deliberations today: 'Can we have a law dictionary?'After quickly conferring, lawyers for Ryan and co-defendant Lawrence Warner agreed with prosecutors on the answer: No.

The jury's note revealed that an African-American mother of four who is a fan of Court TV has been elected forewoman of the jury."

HA. Exponentially Ha. Anyway, this is the legal system today, nay, the jury system. They clearly couldn't be more uncertain about what the hell is going on if they need a freaking law dictionary and they have a Court TV fan as a foreperson, but lets let them chug along... BUT this is the system that Americans entrust justice to and we probably shouldn't mess with that right? I am not sure...for lack of corruption purposes, and to keep the system as "innocent", I say yes, leave it as it is, but on the other hand, the dumbing down of Americans makes me think that its nearly impossible for any lawyer to present a case with an ounce of legal standing without the jury getting confused or just completely sidetracked...I am saying this and I work for a Plaintiff's firm, where the jury system is held to a standard above God, I swear, but this story today? Too funny and too on point when it comes to "average Americans." They prefer their cable TV, their barka loungers, their fast food, and their guns and their religion. I say this is most of America becuase over 50% voted for Bush the second time around...second time around. Key issue here. These are the American Voters. These are the American jurors, or the majority therof.

I don't know, this doesn't even make sense right now - I am just sorta half angry half amused at this story today. End.

Archives